
Manual candidate screen
A concise manual screen of one AI/software candidate profile, role, or code sample link before you advance them.
Why it works
AI-native candidates can look strong on paper while still missing production discipline. This screen focuses the next interview on evidence, verification, and delivery risk.
Does the submitted profile or code sample show production judgment, not just tool familiarity?
Can the candidate supervise agentic workflows, validate outputs, and explain tradeoffs under ambiguity?
What would make this hire risky for a real client system, and what should the next interview verify?
Review output
01
02
03
04
Add a candidate, role, or code sample URL during checkout, plus the main screening concern if you already know where you want a second opinion.